Howard Gardner

Introduction

Howard Earl Gardner (born 11 July 1943) is an American developmental psychologist and education researcher best known for the theory of multiple intelligences, set out in Frames of Mind (1983). His claim was that intelligence is not a single general capacity of the kind standard IQ tests measure, but a set of relatively autonomous capacities — linguistic, logical-mathematical, musical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal and, later, naturalist — each with its own neural substrate and developmental course. The argument was aimed at psychometrics and at schools: if ability is plural, then a single number cannot sort children, and a curriculum built on two of the eight is wasting most of what a child can do. The theory has been far more successful in classrooms than in laboratories. It reshaped how teachers talk about children, and it has never convinced the psychologists who study intelligence for a living.

Early Life and Education

Gardner was born in Scranton, Pennsylvania, to Ralph Gardner and Hilde Weilheimer, German Jews who fled Nazi Germany in 1938 after Kristallnacht, leaving behind a family business and a comfortable life. He grew up with a sense that civilised arrangements are fragile and that moral courage is a subject worth studying — a theme that reappeared decades later in his work on ethics and professional life. He was a serious pianist as a child and has remained a committed amateur musician, an experience often cited as the seed of his dissatisfaction with a psychology of ability that has no place for music.

An older brother died in a sledding accident before Gardner was born, a loss that shadowed his parents and, by his own account, shaped the atmosphere of his childhood. He attended Wyoming Seminary, a school near Scranton, though he had been offered places elsewhere in New England, and excelled academically.

At Harvard College he intended to read law, then shifted toward psychology and the social sciences after encountering Erik Erikson's course on social relations. He graduated summa cum laude in 1965, spent a year at the London School of Economics, and returned to Harvard for a doctorate in developmental psychology, completed in 1971, working with the psychologist Roger Brown, the philosopher Nelson Goodman and Jerome Bruner — Bruner's insistence that human cognition is broad, cultural and not reducible to test performance is the clearest intellectual ancestry of Gardner's later argument.

That supervisory combination — a developmental psycholinguist, a philosopher of symbol systems, and a cognitive psychologist who had turned against the psychometric tradition — produced a peculiar kind of theory. Gardner's is not a hypothesis that generates predictions so much as a re-description of the domain, assembled from neuropsychology, anthropology and a theory of what culture values. That is what makes it persuasive to educators and unsatisfying to psychometricians, and the difference is one of genre rather than of care.

Academic and Professional Career

Gardner's postdoctoral work placed him with the neurologist Norman Geschwind at the Boston Veterans Administration Hospital, where he spent roughly two decades studying patients whose brain damage had selectively destroyed one capacity while sparing others. That clinical material — a musician who could no longer speak, an aphasic who could still paint — became the empirical backbone of Frames of Mind. In parallel he joined Project Zero, the research group on arts and humanistic learning that Goodman had founded at the Harvard Graduate School of Education in 1967; he directed it for decades and made it one of the most productive programmes in educational research.

He became a professor at the Harvard Graduate School of Education in 1986 and holds the John H. and Elisabeth A. Hobbs Research Professorship of Cognition and Education. In 2000 he and Kurt Fischer established a master's programme in Mind, Brain and Education, generally reckoned the first of its kind. Since 1995 a large part of his work has gone into the GoodWork Project — with Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and William Damon — examining how professions sustain excellence, ethics and engagement. With Wendy Fischman he has more recently studied American higher education, published as The Real World of College (2022). He received a MacArthur Fellowship in 1981 and the Prince of Asturias Award for Social Sciences in 2011.

Major Contributions to Psychology

The Theory of Multiple Intelligences

Gardner defines intelligence as a biopsychological potential to process information in ways that can be activated in a cultural setting to solve problems or create products a culture values. His evidence came from four directions: neuropsychology, where damage can destroy one ability and leave others intact; the uneven development of abilities within a single child; the existence of prodigies and savants whose excellence is narrow and specific; and cross-cultural variation in what counts as an intelligent performance. On that basis he proposed that the mind contains several relatively independent computational systems rather than one general-purpose machine.

The list in Frames of Mind ran to seven: linguistic, logical-mathematical, musical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal and intrapersonal. He added naturalist intelligence in 1995 and has discussed existential intelligence as a tentative ninth, while declining to admit it formally on the grounds that the evidence is weak. He has also insisted — repeatedly, and often unheard — that the theory is a claim about what human beings can do, not a scheme for sorting pupils into types.

Education and the Critique of Standard Assessment

Gardner's educational argument is more modest than his popular reputation suggests. He did not propose that every child be tested on eight scales and taught accordingly. He proposed that schools which assess and reward only linguistic and logical-mathematical performance are blind to most of the range they are supposed to develop, and that a broader curriculum would reach more children. This argument, rather than the technical theory, is what travelled.

Later Work: Mind, Brain and Education, and GoodWork

Gardner's later career moved from the structure of abilities toward their use. The GoodWork Project asks how people in journalism, philanthropy, law, medicine and science succeed at work that is excellent, ethical and personally engaging. His writing on education in the digital age — Five Minds for the Future, The App Generation — extends the pluralist premise into questions about what schools should now cultivate.

Major Publications

  • Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences (1983) — the founding statement; seven intelligences
  • The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and How Schools Should Teach (1991) — on why children's intuitive understandings survive instruction
  • Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice (1993) — the theory applied to classrooms
  • Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century (1999) — the updated statement, adding naturalist intelligence
  • Changing Minds: The Art and Science of Changing Our Own and Other People's Minds (2004) — on how beliefs actually change
  • Five Minds for the Future (2006) — the disciplined, synthesising, creating, respectful and ethical minds
  • Truth, Beauty, and Goodness Reframed (2011) — education for the virtues in a digital age
  • The App Generation (2013, with Katie Davis) — on growing up with ubiquitous apps
  • The Real World of College (2022, with Wendy Fischman) — a large qualitative study of American higher education

Impact and Legacy

Gardner's influence on education is difficult to overstate. "Multiple intelligences" entered the vocabulary of schools worldwide; the idea that a child can be good at something the test does not measure is now a professional commonplace in teaching. His work also gave legitimacy to arts education, to the study of expertise, and to the interdisciplinary field of Mind, Brain and Education.

The reception among intelligence researchers has been consistently negative, and the reasons are worth stating precisely. The central empirical objection is that the intelligences are not independent. Visser, Ashton and Vernon (2006) built tasks for each of Gardner's intelligences, administered them to a large sample, and found that the cognitive ones — linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, naturalist, interpersonal, intrapersonal — loaded substantially on a single general factor indistinguishable from the g that Spearman identified a century ago. If the abilities correlate and share a common factor, the claim that they are autonomous is not supported. Lynn Waterhouse's 2006 review in Educational Psychologist surveyed two decades of research and concluded that no good empirical evidence existed for the theory. John Hattie's large-scale synthesis of educational interventions found that MI-aligned curricula produce small documented effects on achievement — smaller than many cheaper alternatives. Critics also point out that Gardner's criteria for what counts as an intelligence are psychological in some cases (spatial) and merely culturally valued in others (musical, bodily-kinesthetic), which makes the list look more like a catalogue of human accomplishments than a taxonomy of cognitive systems.

The neuropsychological argument deserves its own note, since it is the evidence Gardner has always regarded as strongest. A double dissociation — this patient has lost music and kept language, that one the reverse — shows that two capacities are separable somewhere in the brain. It does not show that they are independent in the general population, that they develop on separate schedules, or that they are of comparable intellectual standing. Prodigies and savants point in the same direction and have the same limitation: narrow exceptionality is compatible with a substantial general factor underneath it, and the existence of someone astonishing at calendar calculation tells us little about how many intelligences the rest of us have.

The most consequential misuse has its own evidence base, and it is uniformly negative. The practice of assessing a child's "learning style" or "intelligence profile" and matching instruction to it — the meshing hypothesis — was tested in a comprehensive review by Pashler, McDaniel, Rohrer and Bjork in 2008, and again in subsequent work, with the consistent result that there is no adequate evidence that instruction matched to a measured style produces better outcomes than instruction that is not. Gardner has said for years that this is not what his theory recommends, and he is right. But the practice is widely branded with his name, and it is now among the best-documented examples of an educational intervention that is popular, plausible and unsupported.

Gardner has not ignored this. In 2004 he acknowledged that "MI theory has few enthusiasts among psychometricians or others of a traditional psychological background," and he has on several occasions observed that he was making a claim about what should be valued as much as a claim about mental architecture. He has also explicitly disowned the most common educational application of his work: matching instruction to a child's supposed "learning style" is not what the theory says, and he has said so.

A fair verdict separates the two claims. As a description of the structure of human abilities, multiple intelligences has not been supported: the psychometric evidence favours a substantial general factor, and the proposed intelligences behave like a mixture of abilities, talents and interests rather than separate modules. As an argument about education, it worked — not because the taxonomy is right, but because it gave teachers a language for noticing capacities schools routinely ignore. The danger, which Gardner himself has warned about, is that the second claim borrows authority from the first and neither producers nor purchasers of MI-branded assessment products are careful about the distinction.

Learn More

References

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books.

Last updated: 2026-10-28

Menu
Loading