Alfred Adler

Introduction

Alfred Adler (7 February 1870 – 28 May 1937) was an Austrian physician who broke with Sigmund Freud in 1911 and built a competing system on a different premise. Where Freud explained adult character by biological drive and infantile sexuality, Adler explained it by the feeling of inferiority and what a person does about it — and by the social world the person is trying to find a place in.

The theory he called individual psychology holds that human beings are not pushed by the past but pulled by imagined futures. A child who feels small, weak or incapable constructs a goal of being big, strong or capable, and organises their whole way of being around that goal. Personality, on this account, is a strategy — coherent, largely conscious, and aimed at a future the person has invented.

Adler gave psychology several of its most used terms: inferiority complex, compensation, social interest, style of life, birth order. He was also, and this is less often said, the founder of community mental health — the person who took psychotherapy out of the consulting room and into schools, in front of parents and teachers who could see what he was doing.

He was a strange figure for the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society: a socialist married to a Russian feminist, hostile to the clinic's bourgeois assumptions, opposed to Freud's drive theory on political as much as clinical grounds. Freud never forgave him. In the 2002 Review of General Psychology survey of the most eminent psychologists of the twentieth century, Adler ranked 67th — substantially lower than his influence on later therapy would suggest, largely because he built no research programme and his most famous claim, birth order, has turned out to be wrong.

Early Life and Education

Adler was born in Rudolfsheim, then a suburb of Vienna, the second of seven children in a Jewish family; his father, Leopold, was a Hungarian-born grain merchant. Two facts from his childhood shaped the theory.

The first was illness. Adler had rickets and could not walk until he was four; at five he contracted pneumonia so severe that a doctor told his father the boy was lost. He heard the doctor say it. He recovered and decided to become a physician — the standard reading of his life is that the whole architecture of inferiority and compensation is a description of what he had done himself.

The second was his older brother, Sigmund Adler, whom he adored and competed with and never matched. Adler was, in his own account, the sickly, overlooked second son of a successful first son — a piece of biography worth noting given that the man he later broke with was also called Sigmund and was also a first-born.

He was a poor student. He failed mathematics badly enough that a teacher advised his father to apprentice him to a cobbler, and his father refused. Adler applied himself, passed, and entered the University of Vienna to read medicine, taking his degree in 1895. He trained first in ophthalmology, then moved into general practice and finally into neurology and psychiatry.

In 1897 he married Raissa Timofeyewna Epstein, a Russian émigré and socialist intellectual whom he met at a political meeting — a woman far more radical than he was, and his partner in the work for the rest of his life.

Academic and Professional Career

Freud's circle, and the break

In 1902 Adler was among the four men Freud invited to join the discussion group that became the Wednesday Psychological Society; he had come to Freud's attention by publicly defending The Interpretation of Dreams in a newspaper when it had been received with hostility.

He was never orthodox. His 1907 Study of Organ Inferiority and Its Psychical Compensation argued that physical weakness and defect are compensated psychologically — that the stammerer, the weak child, the person with a constitutional deficit builds a character around overcoming it. The book contained the germs of everything he later built. His 1908 paper on the aggression drive, and his 1910 lectures on the psychic treatment of organ symptoms, pushed further away from Freud's libido theory, and his insistence on social factors rather than infantile sexuality made the break inevitable.

By 1910 Adler was president of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society and co-editor of its journal. In 1911, after a series of public disagreements, he resigned along with his supporters and founded the Society for Individual Psychology in 1912. Freud's response was characteristically unforgiving: he wrote that Adler's theories were founded on a "protest" against psychoanalysis rather than on evidence, and the characterisation of Adler as embittered and theoretically unserious persisted in psychoanalytic writing for decades.

The Vienna years: clinics in schools

After serving as a physician in the Austro-Hungarian army during the First World War, Adler returned to a Vienna governed by the social democrats and threw himself into the reform of its schools and clinics. Between the early 1920s and 1934 he established roughly thirty child guidance clinics attached to Viennese schools.

The innovation was not the clinics but how they worked. Adler conducted consultations in the open, in front of teachers, parents and other children, treating the case as a piece of public education rather than a confidential procedure. He argued that neurosis could not be separated from the social conditions producing it, that the mother, the teacher and the school mattered as much as the child, and that psychology should be preventive and public rather than curative and private. He also ran adult education courses and lectured constantly; by the late 1920s he was one of the best-known public figures in Vienna.

The clinics were closed by the Austrofascist government and then by the Nazis — shut down progressively from 1932 and gone by 1934 — and Adler, who was Jewish and a socialist, left Austria permanently.

America

Adler had first visited the United States in 1926 to lecture at Columbia. In 1932 he took a visiting professorship at the Long Island College of Medicine in New York, and in 1935 he emigrated. He lectured widely, but the American psychoanalytic establishment was hostile and he never held a position matching his European standing.

He died on 28 May 1937 in Aberdeen, Scotland, collapsing in the street of a heart attack during a lecture tour, at sixty-seven. He was cremated in Edinburgh, and his ashes were not returned to Vienna until 2011, when they were finally interred there — seventy-four years after his death.

Major Contributions to Psychology

Inferiority feelings, compensation, and the inferiority complex

Adler's starting point is universal and unavoidable: every human being begins small, weak, dependent and ignorant, and therefore begins with a feeling of inferiority. This is not a pathology; it is the engine. The feeling produces a striving for superiority — a movement toward competence, mastery and significance — and the shape that movement takes is the person's character.

Compensation is the ordinary case: the weak child practises and becomes strong. Overcompensation is the excessive case, in which the effort to overcome the deficit distorts everything else — the stammerer who becomes an orator, the frail boy who becomes a bully. When the feeling of inferiority is so strong that the person gives up striving and organises their life around avoiding failure, Adler called it an inferiority complex, and he treated it as the common structure underlying most neurosis.

He also described safeguarding tendencies — the manoeuvres by which a person protects a fragile self-esteem without ever risking the test: excuses, withdrawal, symptoms that explain failure in advance.

The concept Adler regarded as his most important, and the one that makes the system ethical rather than merely strategic, is social interest (Gemeinschaftsgefühl) — an innate, trainable orientation toward belonging to a community and contributing to it. He treated it as the criterion of mental health: the neurotic person is not chiefly someone who has been damaged but someone whose striving has turned inward, away from the common task, toward private superiority.

This is a normative claim, and Adler was frank that it was one. He argued that all of life's real problems are social problems, that they can only be solved by cooperation, and that a person who has not developed social interest is, in his phrase, on the "useless side of life".

Style of life and fictional finalism

Two connected ideas carry the theory's structure. Style of life is the individual's distinctive, self-consistent pattern of perceiving, valuing and acting — formed early, usually by five or six, and thereafter remarkably stable. Adler read it from a person's earliest memories, on the grounds that a person remembers what fits the story they are living.

Fictional finalism, borrowed from Hans Vaihinger's Philosophy of "As If", is the claim that people are governed by goals that do not exist — ideals of being safe, or loved, or superior, or never wrong — which function as organising fictions. They cannot be verified, and they do not need to be; they work by being believed. Adler's point is that a person can be understood by identifying the fiction they are serving, and that the fiction can be changed.

He classified the resulting styles into four types: the ruling type, which seeks power; the getting (or leaning) type, which depends on others; the avoiding type, which withdraws from risk; and the socially useful type, which has developed social interest and faces life's tasks directly.

Family constellation and birth order

Adler was the first to argue systematically that position in the family shapes personality: the first-born who is "dethroned" by a sibling, the second who is forever in a race, the youngest who is pampered, the only child who never learns to share. He treated the family constellation — not birth order alone but spacing, gender, illness, parental favouritism and the actual family atmosphere — as the setting in which a style of life is built.

The mechanism is plausible. The evidence, as it turns out, is not (see below).

Masculine protest

Adler's most dated concept. Observing that in a patriarchal society boys are praised for strength and girls devalued for weakness, he argued that both sexes may overvalue culturally masculine traits and organise their lives around escaping the feminine position — a striving he called the masculine protest. He was, notably, a feminist and a supporter of women's education, and he intended the concept as a critique of a culture that puts men at the top rather than as a claim about women's nature. The formulation nonetheless presumes masculine superiority as the norm it describes.

Therapy

Adlerian therapy is brief, collaborative and oriented toward the future rather than the past. The therapist works to identify the client's style of life and the fiction it serves, offers encouragement — which Adler treated as the central therapeutic act, on the grounds that discouragement is what maintains neurosis — and helps the client redirect their striving toward the social side. He used early memories, dream material and the analysis of lifestyle, but he did not use the couch, did not emphasise transference, and did not treat insight as the goal.

Major Publications

Study of Organ Inferiority and Its Psychical Compensation (1907) — the first statement of compensation
The Neurotic Constitution (1912) — the systematic presentation of individual psychology after the break with Freud
The Practice and Theory of Individual Psychology (1924) — the lectures that set out the full system
Understanding Human Nature (1927) — his most widely read book, written for a general audience
The Science of Living (1929) — style of life and the technique of understanding a person
What Life Could Mean to You (1931) — a popular restatement
Social Interest: A Challenge to Mankind (1938, posthumous) — the ethical core of his work
Superiority and Social Interest (1979, posthumous collection) — the later papers edited by Heinz and Rowena Ansbacher

Impact and Legacy

Adler's influence is unusually diffuse: he founded a school with few institutions, but his ideas are now so thoroughly absorbed into mainstream practice that their origin is invisible.

The clearest line runs to cognitive and humanistic therapy. Albert Ellis named Adler as one of his principal sources and built REBT on the argument — Adler's — that it is not events but beliefs about events that disturb us. Abraham Maslow, Carl Rogers and Gordon Allport all acknowledged him, and through them Adler's emphasis on conscious goals, agency and the social embeddedness of the person entered humanistic psychology. Adler's concepts are now standard in family therapy, brief therapy, school counselling and organisational consulting.

The second line is community mental health. His Vienna clinics were the first systematic attempt to deliver psychological help outside the consulting room, in the settings where problems actually appear, preventively and publicly. That is now the shape of school-based and community mental health provision everywhere, and the lineage runs directly to him.

The third is education and parenting. Rudolf Dreikurs carried Adlerian practice to the United States and turned it into a parent-education movement — democratic classrooms, natural and logical consequences in place of punishment, the idea that children's misbehaviour has a goal. Children: The Challenge became one of the most influential parenting books of the century, and most of its assumptions are Adler's.

Social interest has had a quiet second life. Adler's claim that well-being depends on belonging and contribution anticipated a large body of contemporary work on social connection, prosocial behaviour and meaning, and it is the part of his system that current research supports best.

Criticism

Birth order is wrong. This is the most famous Adlerian claim and the least supported. Damian and Roberts (2015) analysed 377,000 US high school students and found firstborns averaged one IQ point higher than their siblings and scored marginally higher on dominance, conscientiousness and agreeableness — correlations of roughly 0.02, described by the authors as so small as to be invisible. Rohrer, Egloff and Schmukle (2015), working with over 20,000 people across the US, UK and Germany, found negligible differences on the Big Five. A 2021 meta-analysis of more than a hundred studies reached the same conclusion. Frank Sulloway's Born to Rebel (1996) defends substantial birth-order effects and the dispute continues, but the weight of current evidence is that the effect, if it exists at all, is too small to be useful. What survives is the broader and more defensible claim that the family atmosphere matters — not that ordinal position determines character.

The theory is a philosophy rather than an empirical system. Adler was explicit that he was not running experiments, and he produced almost no data. Concepts like fictional finalism and social interest are close to unfalsifiable as stated, and the four types are a typology with no supporting measurement. His evidence was clinical observation of the kind that cannot distinguish a genuine pattern from a therapist's expectation.

The break with Freud damaged his reception. Freud's characterisation of Adler as motivated by resentment rather than evidence stuck in psychoanalytic writing for fifty years, and Adler's habit of writing for a popular audience rather than for journals did not help. Ranked 67th in the 2002 eminence survey, he is considerably less cited than his actual influence on psychotherapy would predict.

And a historical irony worth stating. Adler's daughter Valentine, an economist and Trotskyist, was arrested in Moscow in 1935 during the purges and died in a Soviet prison in 1942. The man who made social interest and cooperation the measure of psychological health could not protect his own child from the century he was living through.

Associated Figures

Sigmund Freud — whose circle he joined in 1902 and broke with in 1911
Carl Jung — the other great defector, who left two years after Adler
Raissa Epstein — his wife; a Russian socialist and feminist whose politics shaped his social emphasis
Rudolf Dreikurs — who brought Adlerian practice to America and turned it into parent education
Albert Ellis — who acknowledged Adler as a principal source for REBT
Karen Horney — who, like Adler, rejected Freud's account of female development on social rather than biological grounds
Viktor Frankl — who trained in Adler's circle before breaking away to found logotherapy
Hans Vaihinger — the philosopher of "as if" whose work supplied fictional finalism

Learn More

References

Adler, A. (1927). Understanding Human Nature. Greenberg.