Anarcho-Communism
Abolishes the state and private property, with production and distribution run directly by voluntary communes.
- Economy: equality-leaning
- Foreign policy: balanced
- Civil liberties: strong
- Society: change-oriented
Discover your political ideology with the 8 values test (8values). Measure your position on four axes: Economic, Diplomatic, Civil, and Societal.
The 8 values test (8values) is a political compass test that measures your political views on four axes: Economic, Diplomatic, Civil, and Societal.
You will be presented with 70 statements and asked to indicate your level of agreement. Your answers will be used to calculate your position on each axis.
The test measures your position on four independent axes, each representing a different dimension of political thought.
Those with higher Equality scores believe the economy should distribute value evenly among the populace. They tend to support progressive tax codes, social programs, and at high values, socialism.
Those with higher Market scores believe the economy should be focused on rapid growth. They tend to support lower taxes, privatization, deregulation, and at high values, laissez-faire capitalism.
Those with higher Nation scores are patriotic and nationalist. They often believe in an aggressive foreign policy, valuing the military, strength, sovereignty, and at high values, territorial expansion.
Those with higher Globe scores are cosmopolitan and globalist. They often believe in a peaceful foreign policy, emphasizing diplomacy, cooperation, integration, and at high values, a world government.
Those with higher Liberty scores believe in strong civil liberties. They tend to support democracy and oppose state intervention in personal lives. Note that this refers to civil liberties, not economic liberties.
Those with higher Authority scores believe in strong state power. They tend to support state intervention in personal lives, government surveillance, and at high values, censorship or autocracy.
Those with higher Tradition scores believe in traditional values and strict adherence to a moral code. Though not always, they are usually religious, and support the status quo or the status quo ante.
Those with higher Progress scores believe in social change and rationality. Though not always, they are usually secular or atheist, and support environmental action and scientific or technological research.
Your result is matched to the closest entry in this list. Entries are grouped by family; open a group to see what each one stands for.
Abolishes the state and private property, with production and distribution run directly by voluntary communes.
Communist economics combined with strong opposition to authority and a bottom-up style of organization.
Emphasizes permanent revolution and internationalism, holding that socialism has to advance worldwide rather than in one country.
The socialist tradition built on class analysis and historical materialism, treating economic relations as the base of social structure.
Holds that workers should organize through industrial unions and take over production through them.
Centers on a vanguard party leading revolution and on the dictatorship of the proletariat as a transitional state.
Marked by building socialism within one country, rapid state-led industrialization, and highly centralized planning.
Argues that socialist goals require revolution rather than gradual parliamentary reform.
Combines socialist economics with opposition to state authority and support for decentralized self-management.
Treats trade unions as the main vehicle of revolution, with workers managing industry directly.
Replaces state and concentrated capital with mutual aid, cooperative exchange, and voluntary contracts.
Starts from individual autonomy and rejects every external authority, including collective ones.
Places ownership or direction of key industries in the state while pursuing egalitarian goals.
Pursues socialist economic goals through democratic and parliamentary processes.
Reduces inequality through welfare, public services, and redistribution within a market economy.
Combines market economics and personal freedom with a substantial welfare state and public provision.
Advances social equality and expanding rights through institutional reform.
Uses a people-versus-elites frame to push redistribution and anti-establishment politics.
Favors widely distributed property ownership instead of concentration in either the state or large firms.
State-guided development combined with a pragmatic use of markets. Usually associated with cases such as China's reform era, Vietnam's Đổi Mới, and other state-led growth models.
A reformist tradition rooted in trade unions and the working class, favouring redistribution while often remaining socially traditional.
Takes middle positions across the main dimensions without a systematic lean in any direction.
Emphasizes individual rights, the rule of law, and representative government, with a middle economic position.
Socially permissive and market-leaning, while keeping some public provision for basic needs.
Favors marketization, deregulation, and a reduced role for the state in the economy.
Emphasizes limited government, strong property rights, and free trade.
Values continuity of existing institutions, social order, and inherited tradition.
Tradition-oriented on social questions while accepting gradual institutional adjustment.
Emphasizes assertive foreign policy and the maintenance of order, with traditional social positions.
Seeks a return to an earlier social and political order rather than reform of the present one.
Pushes national preference through a nationalist, people-versus-elites framing.
Favors minimal government and the widest possible scope for individual liberty.
Keeps markets almost unregulated and limits the state to property rights and security.
Organizes society entirely through free markets and voluntary contracts, without a state.
Grounds its ethics in rational self-interest and supports laissez-faire capitalism.
Extends market principles into nearly every social domain, including ones usually kept outside them.
Abolishes the state, with private property and markets providing all services including law and security.
Concentrates political power in a single ruler or a narrow group, with limited accountability.
Centers on extreme nationalism, a corporatist state, and the leadership principle.
Centers on racial hierarchy, extreme nationalism, and state-directed economics.
Combines a fascist political structure with capitalist economic interests.
Total state control of society organized around the national community.
Seeks a single worldwide order established through totalitarian means.
Supports communist economics on religious grounds, usually citing shared property in early community practice.
Supports socialist redistribution grounded in religious values and teachings.
Rejects state authority on religious grounds, emphasizing conscience and voluntary community.
Combines a theocratic state structure with socialist economics.
Widely distributed property within a religious social order.
A centre-right democratic current grounded in Christian social ethics, often with a strong welfare tradition.
Advocates strict return to religious scripture and traditional norms as the basis of public life.
Governance guided primarily by expertise and technical criteria rather than political contest.
The state participates in and directs capital and markets rather than merely regulating them.
Market economics coexisting with concentrated political power and restricted contestation.
Combines a totalitarian political structure with capitalist economics.
Matching uses this test's own calibration, not a scholarly consensus. The same current of thought is classified differently in different traditions, so treat the result as a starting point for reading rather than a verdict.
This test only reflects your distribution of tendencies in abstract statements, not telling you "who you are". Don't let a string of percentages define your worldview—real values are formed in concrete actions, not predicted by quiz algorithms.
You may show a bias towards one side on certain dimensions, but this is not a "right" or "wrong" grading system. Treat these scores as tools, not report cards.
These questions are sometimes abstract or general, making it easy to "seem" inclined towards certain values, while actual thoughts may be more complex. Don't be lazy with your thinking; reducing complex reality to simple coordinates can easily mislead yourself.
Your tendency on economic values may not be extremely biased towards "equality" or "markets", meaning you value both efficiency and fairness. But the real challenge is, when real policies require trade-offs, are you ready to think about the consequences instead of settling for compromise?
Being centrist on diplomatic/international views doesn't represent maturity—sometimes it stems from avoiding complex global realities. When facing global issues, simple "balance" is not a stance; clear value judgment is.
If the test shows you are close between liberty and authority, this reflects not necessarily balance, but possibly avoidance or compromise on the contradiction between individual freedom and social order. A truly mature political attitude is understanding why there is a debate, not standing in the grey zone unwilling to take a stand.
Many think "progress = right", "tradition = backward", but true social value is understanding why to progress, for whom, and what wisdom in tradition is worth preserving. Simple labels will make you miss true political discourse.
The score is just your tendency response to abstract statements at a certain moment, not a sign of ideological maturity.
Understanding complex issues like economy, diplomacy, and society cannot be summarized by simply answering questions; it requires reading, dialogue, reflection, and verification.
A test result should not be a reason for you to refuse dialogue or solidify your views. Facing different opinions and accepting criticism is the beginning of true maturity.
This saying is not meant to stir emotions, but to remind us of responsibility. Politics and values are never "someone else's business". How you think, judge, and choose is part of reality itself.
Some questions may be rigorous, others one-sided. Some may resonate with you, others may make you hesitate or uncomfortable. But what truly matters is not the questions themselves, but whether you are willing to ask when facing conflict: Why do I think this way? Can my stance withstand the test of reality?
It proposed a simple yet sharp principle: The standard for testing truth can only be social practice. Any theory—including the tendencies you showed in this test—must be verified in reality. If it cannot explain or improve reality, it needs to be revised.
The true mirror is never the test result. It is history, reality, and the experience of others.
The test gives you only a slice of the present. It may reveal your tendencies or expose your contradictions. But if you are willing to admit your limitations, correct your views in reality, and test your beliefs in practice—then, even as an ordinary person, you may become part of pushing civilization forward.
This test is for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not a scientific assessment and should not be used for serious political analysis.
PolitiScale plots your position on eight political axes - Constructivism, Internationalism, Communism, and more - then see which badges your profile earns.
Measures the tendency to endorse conspiracy theories and conspiratorial thinking across various domains.
Discover your political and ethical profile based on Jonathan Haidt's Moral Foundations Theory.
Have another question? Let us know.
54, grouped into eight families: communist, social-democratic, liberal-centre, conservative, libertarian, authoritarian, religious, and state-capital. Your result is matched to the closest entry in that list.
Economic (equality ↔ market), Diplomatic (world ↔ nation), Civil (liberty ↔ authority), and Societal (progress ↔ tradition). Each axis is scored from 0 to 100.
Your four axis scores are compared with the position each of the 54 entries occupies, and the nearest one is returned. That mapping is this test's own calibration, not a scholarly classification.
No. It is an educational self-reflection instrument, not a psychometric or diagnostic assessment, and its ideology labels are not authoritative definitions. If you are concerned about your mental health, consult a qualified professional.
It names the closest entry among the 54 this test uses. Each entry has a one-sentence description in the list above, along with its direction on the four axes. Treat it as a starting point for reading, not as a verdict.