Stop‑Change Task
Frequently Asked Questions
Have another question? Let us know.
What is the Stop‑Change Task?
The Stop‑Change task assesses response inhibition and flexibility. Participants respond to a left/right arrow with F (left) or J (right), but on some trials the stimulus is withdrawn (stop signal) and on others the arrow flips (change signal).
How does a single trial work?
A left/right arrow appears and you respond with F/J. In stop trials, the stimulus is withdrawn after a stop‑signal delay (SSD) and the correct action is to withhold any response — a keypress at any point in the trial counts as a failed inhibition. In change trials, after a change‑signal delay (CSD) the arrow flips and you should respond to the NEW direction; pressing the direction that was shown before the flip, or responding before the flip, is scored as an error. Responding to the wrong direction is always an error.
Which metrics are reported?
We report mean reaction time on correct Go trials (Mean Go RT), the success rate of Stop trials, and the success rate of Change trials (a correct response to the new direction). The SSD adapts up/down in 50 ms steps across stop trials, and the CSD adapts the same way across change trials (success makes the next signal delay 50 ms longer, failure 50 ms shorter, within 50–850 ms), keeping success rates near the middle of the range. We also show mean-method estimates: SSRT ≈ Mean Go RT − Mean SSD, and CSRT ≈ Mean Go RT − Mean CSD, where the mean signal delays are averaged over the staircase-converged trials (a mean method, not the integration method). Estimates show "—" until at least one stop/change trial and one valid go trial have been recorded.
How to interpret performance?
Faster Go RT reflects baseline speed. Higher Stop success suggests stronger inhibitory control, while higher Change success indicates better cognitive flexibility and rapid re‑mapping of responses under signals. Like all single-session scores, these estimates are noisy and descriptive only.
References
- Logan, G. D., & Burkell, J. (1986). Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: A comparison of stop, change, and dual-task paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(4), 549-563. 10.1037/0096-1523.12.4.549
- Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91(3), 295-327. 10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.295
- Verbruggen, F., Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2008). How to stop and change a response: The role of goal activation in multitasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1212-1228. 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1212
Related Experiments
Hick's Law Experiment
FeaturedInvestigates how the number of choices affects decision-making time, a classic study in cognitive psychology.
Stroop Effect Experiment
FeaturedExamines cognitive control by testing interference between naming colors and reading words.
Negative Priming Experiment
FeaturedExplores how ignored stimuli affect subsequent responses, revealing attentional suppression mechanisms.
Learn More
APM Test - Actions Per Minute
FeaturedMeasure your clicking speed and visual reaction time. Click numbers from 50 to 1 as fast as possible!
Free IQ Test
FeaturedTest your intelligence quotient with this free IQ test covering pattern recognition, logical reasoning, and spatial skills.
Cognitive Processing and Performance Mindset Scale
FeaturedAssess cognitive processing and performance mindset across standard dimensions.
About This Experiment
This experiment is an educational adaptation for demonstration purposes. It is not a clinical diagnostic tool. Results reflect your performance in this specific session and should not be interpreted as an assessment of your cognitive abilities.
Data Privacy
Your experiment data is processed and stored locally in your browser. No data is uploaded to any server unless you explicitly export it.
