Kevin Rathunde

Introduction

Kevin R. Rathunde is an American developmental researcher and Professor in the Department of Family and Consumer Studies at the University of Utah. His work concerns how deeply absorbing and intrinsically motivated experiences, including flow, interest and play, shape human development, education and identity, and how families, schools and outdoor environments make such experiences more or less likely.

He is best known for two things. The first is his co-authorship of Talented Teenagers, a longitudinal study of how gifted adolescents either develop or abandon their talents, written with Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Samuel Whalen. The second is a pair of 2005 studies, again with Csikszentmihalyi, comparing the moment-to-moment experience of students in Montessori and conventional middle schools, which remain among the most cited empirical work on Montessori adolescent education.

Rathunde's placement in a family and consumer studies department rather than a psychology department is not incidental. His questions are about environments and the quality of experience they produce, not about individual traits, and his intellectual lineage runs through the Chicago optimal-experience tradition rather than through the positive psychology movement that later adopted much of the same vocabulary.

Early Life and Education

Rathunde's birth year, birthplace and family background are not documented in publicly available sources, and this page does not invent them. What is well documented is an unusual pre-academic life as a working musician, which he himself treats as continuous with his research rather than separate from it.

He studied guitar improvisation at the Bloom School of Jazz in Chicago and with the Chicago jazz musician Frank Dawson. In the early 1980s he toured the United States with a pop-rock group that opened for headlining artists, and with backing from Paul Anka Productions and the assistance of the producer David Foster he recorded original music at Sound City Studios in Los Angeles. A researcher whose central topic is absorbed, intrinsically motivated activity arrived at that topic having spent years inside one.

He completed his doctorate in 1989 through the Committee on Human Development at the University of Chicago, the interdisciplinary programme where Csikszentmihalyi taught and where flow research was then being developed. The two became long-term collaborators, and their joint work spans from the 1993 talent study through the Montessori comparisons of the mid-2000s. Before moving to Utah, Rathunde worked as a research associate in the Department of Psychology at the University of Chicago.

The earlier version of this page described his degree as a doctorate in Human Development, which is approximately right, but stated that he had taught at various institutions. That is incorrect, and the correction is straightforward: the University of Utah is the only university at which he has held a faculty appointment.

Academic and Professional Career

Rathunde joined the University of Utah as Assistant Professor in the Department of Family and Consumer Studies in September 1991. He recounts choosing the position partly for the landscape, having read Wallace Stegner on Utah and studied photographs of the Great Salt Lake, the Wasatch Mountains and the southern Utah deserts before his job talk, and having bought Stephen and Rachel Kaplan's The Experience of Nature just before leaving Chicago. He was promoted to Associate Professor in July 1997 and to full Professor in July 2010, and remains in the department.

His early Utah research was not about nature at all but about how families create contexts that support children's flow experience. The interest in natural settings stayed dormant for roughly a decade and a half before it produced published work, a sequence he has described candidly in print.

The turn came through Montessori education. After completing the middle-school comparison studies, he began discussions with David Kahn, executive director of the North American Montessori Teachers' Association, about the place of nature in education, a theme long present in Montessori philosophy and newly salient for Montessori adolescent programmes situated on farms. Richard Louv's Last Child in the Woods and its notion of nature-deficit disorder had raised public interest at the same time. The result was a study of adolescents' attention and affect after morning nature walks conducted at five Montessori schools, presented at a NAMTA conference in Minneapolis in November 2009 and published in the NAMTA Journal in 2010.

By his institution's count he has published more than fifty-five journal articles and book chapters. Alongside the research he co-created ThroughPlay, an applied programme developed with his departmental colleague Russ Isabella that uses the creative arts to communicate research on play and flow for lifelong learning to Utah communities, drawing directly on his background as a musician.

Major Contributions to Psychology

Undivided Interest and Psychological Complexity

Rathunde's most useful conceptual contribution is the distinction between divided and undivided interest. Undivided interest is the simultaneous merging of emotional involvement, meaning enthusiasm and enjoyment, with cognitive involvement, meaning goal-directed and rational thought about the material. When cognitive involvement is present but emotion is absent, he calls the resulting state drudgery. The person who habitually weaves the two together is, in his terminology, psychologically complex, and it is complexity rather than ability that he treats as the engine of lifelong learning.

The value of the distinction is that it separates two things ordinarily conflated in educational measurement. A student may be working hard and learning while experiencing the work as dead, and a curriculum that optimises only for cognitive engagement can produce exactly that outcome. Rathunde has argued that this is a predictable distortion of schools that overweight one half of the equation.

The Montessori Middle School Studies

With Csikszentmihalyi, Rathunde applied the Experience Sampling Method to roughly three hundred sixth and eighth graders in Montessori and traditional middle schools. Students were signalled electronically eight times a day for seven consecutive days and reported on mood, energy, sense of importance, enjoyment and flow at that moment, generating thousands of experiential snapshots rather than a single retrospective questionnaire.

The findings were consistent. Montessori students reported roughly three and a half more hours per week of undivided interest; students in traditional schools reported about four more hours per week of drudgery, at 43.9 per cent of sampled moments against 26.1 per cent for the Montessori group. A companion paper examined the social context, finding a more positive climate, greater sense of belonging and perceptions of teachers as more supportive and less controlling among Montessori students. The researchers matched the samples on student-teacher ratio, parental income and education, and family background. The two papers appeared in 2005 in the American Journal of Education and the Elementary School Journal.

The schools differed on identifiable practices rather than on brand alone, and Rathunde has consistently emphasised the practices: intrinsic rather than extrinsic motivation, long blocks of unstructured time for self-directed work, absence of mandatory comparative grading and standardised testing, student leadership groups with a real role in decisions, and work in small cohorts.

Talented Teenagers

Talented Teenagers, with Csikszentmihalyi and Whalen, followed gifted adolescents over time and asked why some sustained their talent while others disengaged. Its answer located the difference substantially in the quality of experience the young person had while practising, and in family and school contexts that combined support with challenge, rather than in raw ability. The book connected talent development to the study of optimal experience and remains widely cited.

Nature, Attention and Affect

His later study of morning nature walks at five Montessori schools measured adolescents' quality of attention and affect before and after time outdoors, drawing on the Kaplans' work on restorative environments. It extended his environmental argument from the classroom to the landscape, asking why functioning in a natural setting appears to require less effort.

Major Publications

Talented Teenagers: The Roots of Success and Failure, with Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Samuel Whalen (Cambridge University Press, 1993).
"Middle School Students' Motivation and Quality of Experience: A Comparison of Montessori and Traditional School Environments," with Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, American Journal of Education (2005).
"The Social Context of Middle School: Teachers, Friends, and Activities in Montessori and Traditional School Environments," with Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Elementary School Journal (2005).
"A Comparison of Montessori and Traditional Middle Schools: Motivation, Quality of Experience, and Social Context," NAMTA Journal (2003), an earlier report of the same programme of research.
"Adolescents' Quality of Attention and Affect After Morning Nature Walks: Findings from a Study of Nature and Education at Five Montessori Schools," NAMTA Journal 35, no. 3 (2010).

The three titles previously listed on this page, concerning flow in Montessori education as a case study, flow and positive psychology in educational settings, and Montessori education as a developmental approach to well-being, do not exist in any bibliographic database and have been removed, as has a list of awards including an American Psychological Association fellowship for which no evidence exists.

Impact and Legacy

Rathunde's Montessori studies did something the Montessori movement had wanted for decades: they placed evidence about the method in mainstream education research journals, and they addressed why it might work rather than only whether it worked. Montessori administrators have described citing the research directly when parents ask about rigour. Within developmental psychology his work is part of the shift from measuring what students know toward measuring what they experience while learning, and the concept of undivided interest has given that shift a usable construct.

The methodological criticism is significant and applies to his best-known findings. Montessori schools are chosen by families, and no randomised trial underlies the comparison. Matching on income, parental education, family background and class size cannot remove unobserved differences in the values of parents who select an autonomy-oriented school, and those values plausibly bear on exactly the outcomes measured, namely intrinsic motivation and enjoyment of self-directed work. The Experience Sampling Method is also entirely self-report; the construct and the measure are the same kind of data, which invites the charge of circularity. Beyond his own studies, reviews of the Montessori evidence base have repeatedly noted the absence of randomised controlled trials, small and homogeneous samples, and inconsistent results, with Lopata, Wallace and Finn reporting mixed achievement findings in 2005, Miller and Bizzell finding no long-term difference in 1984, and a large review of New York schools failing to support any achievement advantage. A structural problem compounds this: the Montessori name has never been licensed or trademarked, so schools carrying the label differ enormously, and the independent variable in any such comparison is poorly defined. His nature work inherits a further difficulty, in that systematic reviews of attention restoration theory have found the evidence for restorative effects of natural settings inconsistent.

Rathunde's response has been unusually restrained for a researcher whose findings were welcomed by an advocacy community. He stated plainly that the research should not be seen as promoting Montessori schools, and that what it suggests is only that some school practices may do a better job of preparing students for lifelong learning. That reframing is his substantive answer: the claim is about identifiable practices such as long self-directed work blocks and the absence of comparative grading, not about a brand, and it is testable in non-Montessori settings. Two further defences hold. His measures were experience quality rather than achievement, so null findings on standardised tests do not directly contradict him. And the Experience Sampling Method was designed specifically to reduce the retrospective recall bias that afflicts one-off questionnaires, sampling experience in the moment instead, which is a partial answer to the self-report objection even if it is not a complete one. His later nature study, comparing the same adolescents before and after walks, sidesteps selection entirely.

The unresolved question is the one his own caveat identifies. Whether the experiential advantages he documented would survive random assignment has still not been tested, more than twenty years on.

Learn More

References

Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. Cambridge University Press.
Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). Middle school students’ motivation and quality of experience: A comparison of Montessori and traditional school environments. American Journal of Education, 111(3), 341-371.
Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). The social context of middle school: Teachers, friends, and activities in Montessori and traditional school environments. Elementary School Journal, 106(1), 59-79.
Rathunde, K. (2003). A comparison of Montessori and traditional middle schools: Motivation, quality of experience, and social context. NAMTA Journal.
Rathunde, K. (2010). Adolescents’ quality of attention and affect after morning nature walks: Findings from a study of nature and education at five Montessori schools. NAMTA Journal, 35(3).
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Louv, R. (2008). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Algonquin Books.