Probabilistic Reward Task

Frequently Asked Questions

Have another question? Let us know.

Key outcome?

Response bias index reflecting reward sensitivity.

What happens in the PRT?

A single horizontal bar appears on each trial, either short or long. Classify it with a keypress: F (left) for short, J (right) for long. Correct responses are usually rewarded and incorrect ones occasionally are — and rewards are deliberately asymmetric, with responses on one side secretly rewarded more often, which can gradually pull your choices toward that side.

What does the outcome index?

Your response bias toward the more-rewarded ambiguous stimulus — a laboratory readout of reward learning developed by Pizzagalli and colleagues. Note one deviation: this version classifies clearly different line lengths (2 vs 8 bars), so stimulus discriminability is much higher than in the original hard-to-distinguish face stimuli; d′ here mainly checks task engagement rather than measuring subtle perceptual discrimination.

Does a weak bias mean anything?

Blunted reward learning has been studied in relation to anhedonia and depression in group research; a single online session cannot support that kind of interpretation.

Show Details

About the Probabilistic Reward Task

Background

The Probabilistic Reward Task, developed by Heinrich et al., measures reward sensitivity by creating an asymmetry in reward probabilities between two identical stimuli. Over trials, participants develop a preference for the more frequently rewarded stimulus, revealing their behavioral sensitivity to reward history.

Mechanism

The task exploits the phenomenon that even slight differences in reward probability produce measurable shifts in choice behavior. This reflects reinforcement learning processes where choices that yield rewards become more probable over time through a winner-stay mechanism.

Clinical Applications

Reduced reward sensitivity has been linked to anhedonia, depression, and schizophrenia. The Probabilistic Reward Task is used in clinical research to assess reward processing deficits that may not be captured by simpler tasks.

References

  • Pessiglione, M., Seymour, B., Flandin, G., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Dopamine-dependent prediction errors underpin reward-seeking behaviour in humans. Nature, 442(7106), 1042-1045. 10.1038/nature05051
  • Pizzagalli, D. A., Jahn, A. L., & O'Shea, J. P. (2005). Toward an objective characterization of an anhedonic phenotype: A signal-detection approach. Biological Psychiatry, 57(4), 319-327. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.11.026
  • Der-Avakian, A., & Markou, A. (2012). The neurobiology of anhedonia and other reward-related deficits. Trends in Neurosciences, 35(1), 68-77. 10.1016/j.tins.2011.11.005

About This Experiment

This experiment is an educational adaptation for demonstration purposes. It is not a clinical diagnostic tool. Results reflect your performance in this specific session and should not be interpreted as an assessment of your cognitive abilities.

Data Privacy

Your experiment data is processed and stored locally in your browser. No data is uploaded to any server unless you explicitly export it.

Buy me a coffee