Probabilistic Reward Task
Frequently Asked Questions
Have another question? Let us know.
Key outcome?
Response bias index reflecting reward sensitivity.
What happens in the PRT?
A single horizontal bar appears on each trial, either short or long. Classify it with a keypress: F (left) for short, J (right) for long. Correct responses are usually rewarded and incorrect ones occasionally are — and rewards are deliberately asymmetric, with responses on one side secretly rewarded more often, which can gradually pull your choices toward that side.
What does the outcome index?
Your response bias toward the more-rewarded ambiguous stimulus — a laboratory readout of reward learning developed by Pizzagalli and colleagues. Note one deviation: this version classifies clearly different line lengths (2 vs 8 bars), so stimulus discriminability is much higher than in the original hard-to-distinguish face stimuli; d′ here mainly checks task engagement rather than measuring subtle perceptual discrimination.
Does a weak bias mean anything?
Blunted reward learning has been studied in relation to anhedonia and depression in group research; a single online session cannot support that kind of interpretation.
Show Details
About the Probabilistic Reward Task
Background
The Probabilistic Reward Task, developed by Heinrich et al., measures reward sensitivity by creating an asymmetry in reward probabilities between two identical stimuli. Over trials, participants develop a preference for the more frequently rewarded stimulus, revealing their behavioral sensitivity to reward history.
Mechanism
The task exploits the phenomenon that even slight differences in reward probability produce measurable shifts in choice behavior. This reflects reinforcement learning processes where choices that yield rewards become more probable over time through a winner-stay mechanism.
Clinical Applications
Reduced reward sensitivity has been linked to anhedonia, depression, and schizophrenia. The Probabilistic Reward Task is used in clinical research to assess reward processing deficits that may not be captured by simpler tasks.
References
- Pessiglione, M., Seymour, B., Flandin, G., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Dopamine-dependent prediction errors underpin reward-seeking behaviour in humans. Nature, 442(7106), 1042-1045. 10.1038/nature05051
- Pizzagalli, D. A., Jahn, A. L., & O'Shea, J. P. (2005). Toward an objective characterization of an anhedonic phenotype: A signal-detection approach. Biological Psychiatry, 57(4), 319-327. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.11.026
- Der-Avakian, A., & Markou, A. (2012). The neurobiology of anhedonia and other reward-related deficits. Trends in Neurosciences, 35(1), 68-77. 10.1016/j.tins.2011.11.005
Related Experiments
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)
FeaturedAssesses cognitive flexibility and abstract thinking through rule-switching tasks.
Iowa Gambling Task (IGT)
FeaturedSimulates decision-making under risk to study emotional and cognitive influences.
Tower of Hanoi
FeaturedPractice planning and move optimization in the classic three-peg puzzle; your move count is compared against the optimal solution.
Learn More
APM Test - Actions Per Minute
FeaturedMeasure your clicking speed and visual reaction time. Click numbers from 50 to 1 as fast as possible!
Free IQ Test
FeaturedTest your intelligence quotient with this free IQ test covering pattern recognition, logical reasoning, and spatial skills.
Cognitive Processing and Performance Mindset Scale
FeaturedAssess cognitive processing and performance mindset across standard dimensions.
About This Experiment
This experiment is an educational adaptation for demonstration purposes. It is not a clinical diagnostic tool. Results reflect your performance in this specific session and should not be interpreted as an assessment of your cognitive abilities.
Data Privacy
Your experiment data is processed and stored locally in your browser. No data is uploaded to any server unless you explicitly export it.
