Levels of Processing Experiment

In this task you will see a series of words and answer a quick question about each one — sometimes about its appearance, sometimes about its meaning. Please complete the whole task in one sitting.

Show Details

What is Levels of Processing?

The levels of processing theory, proposed by Fergus Craik and Robert Lockhart in 1972, suggests that memory retention is determined by the depth of mental processing. Deep, semantic processing leads to better memory than shallow, structural or phonemic processing.

Shallow vs. Deep Processing

Shallow processing involves surface features like whether a word is in capital letters or rhymes with another word. Deep processing involves semantic features like whether the word fits in a sentence or describes a living thing. Deep processing creates stronger, more durable memory traces.

Study Implications

This research has important implications for learning and studying. Simply re-reading material (shallow processing) is less effective than actively thinking about meaning, making connections, and relating information to what you already know (deep processing). This is why techniques like elaborative interrogation and self-explanation are effective study strategies.

Frequently Asked Questions

Have another question? Let us know.

What is the levels of processing theory?

The levels of processing theory, proposed by Fergus Craik and Robert Lockhart in 1972, suggests that memory retention is determined by the depth of mental processing. Deep, semantic processing leads to better memory than shallow, structural or phonemic processing.

What is the difference between shallow and deep processing?

Shallow processing involves surface features like whether a word is in capital letters or rhymes with another word. Deep processing involves semantic features like whether the word fits in a sentence or describes a living thing. Deep processing creates stronger, more durable memory traces.

How can I apply levels of processing to studying?

Simply re-reading material (shallow processing) is less effective than actively thinking about meaning, making connections, and relating information to what you already know (deep processing). Techniques like elaborative interrogation and self-explanation are effective because they promote deep processing.

Does depth of processing matter?

Deep processing creates more elaborate memory traces with multiple connections to existing knowledge. When you think about meaning, you're not just storing the word itself, but its relationships, implications, and connections to what you already know, making it easier to retrieve later.

How reliable is my result?

This is a small-sample demonstration with 12 words per condition, so a difference of one or two recalled words between the shallow and deep conditions is within noise. Only clear, consistent gaps should be read as suggesting the levels-of-processing effect.

References

  • Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671-684. 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
  • Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 268-294. 10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268
  • Craik, F. I. M. (2002). Levels of processing: Past, present... and future? Memory, 10(5-6), 305-318. 10.1080/09658210244000135

About This Experiment

This experiment is an educational adaptation for demonstration purposes. It is not a clinical diagnostic tool. Results reflect your performance in this specific session and should not be interpreted as an assessment of your cognitive abilities.

Data Privacy

Your experiment data is processed and stored locally in your browser. No data is uploaded to any server unless you explicitly export it.

Buy me a coffee