Michelle McQuaid

Introduction

Michelle McQuaid is an Australian workplace well-being researcher, author and consultant who has become one of the most widely used translators of positive psychology into organisational practice. She holds a Master of Applied Positive Psychology from the University of Pennsylvania and a doctorate on Appreciative Inquiry summits supervised by David Cooperrider and Celeste Wilderom, is an honorary fellow at the Centre for Wellbeing Science at the University of Melbourne, and founded The Wellbeing Lab in 2012. Her best-known contributions are practical and deliberately free: the PERMAH Well-being Survey, developed with Peggy Kern, and the PERMA+4 measure she validated with Stewart Donaldson and Margaret Kern. She is a regular contributor to Psychology Today and host of the Making Positive Psychology Work podcast, and she describes her role as turning research into "actionable, affordable, and measurable" strategies.

Early Life and Education

McQuaid came to psychology from management rather than from academia, and says so plainly. She has written that she grew up in a family "overwhelmed with mental health challenges, violence, and drug abuse," and that she spent her twenties and thirties climbing corporate ladders — becoming, by her account, the youngest ever general manager at a large advertising firm, then working for IBM and PwC and becoming a global brand director in New York — while finding that her life "looked great on paper" and left her a "stressed-out mess."

That dissatisfaction, combined with a frustration that organisational change programmes produced compliance rather than commitment, took her back to university. She completed the Master of Applied Positive Psychology at the University of Pennsylvania from 2008, flying to Philadelphia from Melbourne every three weeks, and joined PwC Australia's HR team in 2009 to apply what she had learned. She completed her PhD in 2019. Her route into the field explains both the strength and the weakness of her position: unusually close to the problems practitioners actually face, and largely outside the peer-review system that would ordinarily vet the tools she publishes.

Academic and Professional Career

After PwC, McQuaid founded The Wellbeing Lab in 2012 to develop free, evidence-based well-being tools for workplaces and schools. The decision to give the instruments away rather than license them is the single most consequential thing about her career: it is why PERMAH spread through organisations that would never have commissioned a psychometrician, and it is also why the tools exist in a space where no journal has passed judgement on them.

She co-created The Change Lab in 2019 with her doctoral work on Appreciative Inquiry summits, and The Leaders Lab, and has consulted to organisations including Deloitte, IBM, LendLease, Treasury Wine Estates and the Dubai Government. Her clients have ranged from football-stadium-scale workshops to board-level advisory work, and her writing has appeared in Forbes, the Harvard Business Review and The Age. She is recognised as a mental health thought leader on LinkedIn and has published over 250 interviews with researchers and practitioners — a body of work that functions as an oral history of applied positive psychology in the 2010s, and that she uses explicitly to hold the field to its own evidence standards.

Major Contributions to Psychology

Measuring well-being at work

McQuaid's most consequential contribution is measurement. With Peggy Kern she developed the PERMAH Well-being Survey, extending Seligman's five-element PERMA model — positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, accomplishment — with a sixth domain, health. The survey was released free and has been used by a large number of organisations, which is precisely why it matters: it made structured well-being measurement available to employers who would never have commissioned a psychometrician.

Its longer-term significance is that it became the applied platform for more rigorous work. With Stewart Donaldson and Margaret Kern, McQuaid co-developed the PERMA+4 short scale, which adds physical health, mindset, work environment and economic security. That measure has been validated cross-culturally using item response theory (2023), extended to team and supervisor levels as systems-informed PERMA+4 (2024), and linked to psychological safety in an international sample (2025). The trajectory is worth noting: a practitioner tool that was later retrofitted with the psychometric work it did not initially have.

Appreciative Inquiry and systems change

Her doctoral research asked how Appreciative Inquiry summits help organisational systems to flourish, and she co-authored with Cooperrider the widely cited "The positive arc of systemic strengths" (2012), which argues for combining appreciative inquiry with sustainable design at the level of whole systems rather than individuals. This thread — that well-being is a property of systems, not of persons — has become more prominent in her recent work.

Strengths-based coaching and practice

McQuaid's Your Strengths Blueprint (2014, with Emma Lawn) brought character strengths into mainstream management development, and she co-edited Positive Psychology Coaching in Practice (Routledge, 2018) with Ryan Niemiec and Freda Doman, contributing a chapter on character strengths-based coaching. Her popular books, including Your Wellbeing Blueprint (2017, with Peggy Kern) and Your Change Blueprint (2018, with Cooperrider), are designed as workbooks rather than arguments — a deliberate choice, and one that makes them almost impossible to review by normal academic standards.

The move to psychosocial safety

In the 2020s her focus shifted from individual resilience toward psychosocial hazards, following Australian regulatory changes that made employers legally responsible for psychological risk. Your Leadership Blueprint: Fostering Psychosocial Safety at Work and her Psychology Today writing on burnout, hybrid work and psychological safety reflect that reorientation — and, notably, put her on the same side as her critics.

Major Publications

  • Cooperrider, D. L., & McQuaid, M. (2012). The positive arc of systemic strengths. Journal of Corporate Citizenship.
  • McQuaid, M., & Lawn, E. (2014). Your Strengths Blueprint: How to Be Engaged, Energized and Happy at Work.
  • McQuaid, M., & Kern, P. (2017). Your Wellbeing Blueprint: Feeling Good and Doing Well at Work.
  • McQuaid, M., Niemiec, R., & Doman, F. (Eds.) (2018). Positive Psychology Coaching in Practice. Routledge.
  • McQuaid, M., & Cooperrider, D. L. (2018). Your Change Blueprint: How to Design and Deliver an AI Summit.
  • Donaldson, S. I., Donaldson, S. I., McQuaid, M., & Kern, M. L. (2023). The PERMA+4 short scale: A cross-cultural empirical validation using item response theory. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 8(3), 555–569.
  • Donaldson, S. I., Donaldson, S. I., McQuaid, M., & Kern, M. L. (2025). Systems-informed PERMA+4 and psychological safety. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 20(3), 538–543.

Impact and Legacy

McQuaid has probably put well-being measurement into more organisations than any academic in her field, and she has done it by giving the instruments away. Her work is cited by practitioners far more than by researchers, which is both the point and the problem.

The case against workplace well-being programmes

The large-scale evidence is discouraging. The most serious challenge comes from William Fleming's study of 46,336 workers across 233 UK organisations, published in the Industrial Relations Journal in 2024. Comparing matched pairs of participants and non-participants, Fleming found no reliable difference in well-being for mindfulness, resilience training, stress management, relaxation classes, time management, coaching, wellbeing apps or sleep programmes; resilience and stress management training was associated with slightly worse outcomes, probably because distressed workers self-select into them. The only intervention associated with a benefit was employer-supported volunteering. Fleming's conclusion was that organisations need to change the workplace, not the worker.

The individual-level framing may be the wrong level. This is the structural version of the same criticism, made by the Australian Psychological Society's Zena Burgess and by the UK's Trades Union Congress among others: interventions that teach employees to cope with workload, low autonomy and bad management locate the problem in the person who has least power to fix it. Some organisational researchers go further and argue that personalised well-being initiatives function as social control.

The measurement is contested. The PERMAH survey was released as a practitioner tool and was not peer-reviewed at launch; its validation arrived later and indirectly through PERMA+4. More generally, psychometric comparisons have questioned whether five- or six-component models of well-being add explanatory value over simpler, well-established measures of subjective well-being — the risk being that employers buy a more complicated instrument than they need. There is also a question about the underlying taxonomy: the character-strengths classification her coaching work rests on has itself been criticised for unstable factor structure across cultures, which matters if the instruments built on it are being used in exactly the international corporate settings they are.

The commercial structure is awkward. McQuaid gives her instruments away and sells her time, which is a cleaner arrangement than licensing a proprietary survey — but it is not a neutral one. The free tools establish the framework, the framework generates demand for the consulting, and the consulting is where the money is. The well-being industry as a whole has grown into a very large market on the strength of employer anxiety about burnout and psychological-safety regulation, and anyone positioned as the person who can help is positioned to benefit from the anxiety whether or not the intervention works.

What survives. McQuaid's own trajectory is the strongest reply available to her. Her recent work on systems-informed PERMA+4 measures well-being at team and supervisor level and links it to psychological safety, and her writing on psychosocial hazards treats job design, workload and management practice as the intervention targets — the same conclusion Fleming reached. Practitioners also make a fair point about Fleming's data: as Bill Howatt put it, many of the programmes studied were "random acts of wellness" rather than designed, evaluated initiatives, and the finding is as much an indictment of implementation as of the ideas. The open question is whether the well-being industry can survive a critique that says its customers should spend the money on working conditions instead.

Learn More

Last updated: 2026-10-20

Menu
Loading