Charles R. Snyder

Introduction

Charles Richard "Rick" Snyder (December 26, 1944 – January 17, 2006) was an American clinical psychologist who turned hope — a word science had largely left to poets — into a measurable construct with a theory, a scale, and an intervention literature. Wright Distinguished Professor of Clinical Psychology at the University of Kansas, where he spent his entire 34-year career, Snyder founded and directed one of the country's leading clinical training programs, edited the Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology for twelve years, and became a founding architect of positive psychology, co-editing the field's defining handbooks and writing its first textbook. His hope theory, built on the two "thinking towers" of agency and pathways, made hope one of the most studied variables in contemporary well-being research.

Early Life and Education

Snyder was born in Council Bluffs, Iowa, to a salesman father and a mother who taught elementary school. The family moved frequently through his childhood, with stints in Texas and California, and the peripatetic, adventurous boy took up amateur boxing as a Golden Gloves competitor — an upbringing his family later credited for his easy conversation with strangers of every sort.

He earned his bachelor's degree in psychology at Southern Methodist University, then pursued graduate training in psychology and clinical psychology, with Vanderbilt University figures in every account (his family's obituary lists his master's and doctorate from Vanderbilt, while the University of Kansas's own materials describe a doctorate from SMU followed by doctoral-level clinical training at Vanderbilt — a discrepancy unresolved in the public record). He rounded out his preparation with postdoctoral clinical work at the Langley Porter Institute in San Francisco, then joined the University of Kansas in 1972 as an assistant professor of psychology.

Academic and Professional Career

At Kansas, Snyder built his reputation twice over. From 1974 to 2001 he directed the clinical psychology program, shaping it into a nationally recognized training model, and he held the M. Erik Wright Distinguished Professorship in Clinical Psychology. Colleagues described a relentlessly productive and unfailingly generous presence: he gathered 27 teaching awards and 31 research awards, was twice voted KU's HOPE Award for outstanding progressive education by graduating seniors (1991 and 2004), received the Guilford Press Award for pioneering scholarly contributions (2001) and the Balfour Jeffrey Award for research achievement (2002), and in 2000 received the American Psychological Association's Raymond Fowler Outstanding Graduate Mentor Award after 41 students completed dissertations under his chairmanship. Indiana Wesleyan University conferred an honorary doctorate in 2005. He edited the Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology from 1986 to 1998, and in 2000 he demonstrated hope theory on national television, running a live experiment with the correspondents of Good Morning America.

Snyder's research program spanned clinical, social, personality, and health psychology. Before hope made him famous, he had already built influential lines of work on how people react to personal feedback, the human need for uniqueness (with Howard Fromkin), self-handicapping (with Raymond Higgins and Steven Berglas), and the psychology of excuses — the argument, developed with Higgins and Rita Stuckey in Excuses: Masquerades in Search of Grace (1983), that excuse-making is a normal and often adaptive mechanism for disconnecting people from past failures.

What connects these apparently disparate topics is a single preoccupation: how people manage the gap between how things are and how they want them to be. Uniqueness theory asked what happens when people are told they are interchangeable; self-handicapping asked why people sabotage their own performances; the work on excuses asked how people protect a sense of self after failure. Hope theory was the same question turned around — what makes people keep going — and Snyder's colleagues have described it as the point at which two decades of research on defensive manoeuvres resolved into their positive counterpart. He was explicit that he had spent years studying the strategies people use to fail gracefully before he began studying the ones they use to succeed.

The clinical program he directed at Kansas embodied the same commitment: a scientist-practitioner model in which trainees were expected to run studies and see patients, and in which Snyder's own door was, by many accounts, permanently open. He supervised 41 dissertations and continued to co-author with former students long after they had left, which is part of why hope research spread through departments so quickly after his death.

Major Contributions to Psychology

Hope Theory

Snyder's mature contribution defines hope as goal-directed cognition, not emotion. Hope requires three elements: goals — the anchors of directed thought; agency — the perceived will and motivation to pursue them; and pathways — the perceived capacity to generate routes toward them, including alternative routes when blocked. Hope, in his phrase, reflects "the will and the ways" (the title of his 1991 theoretical paper with colleagues). Crucially, Snyder treated hope as a way of thinking that could be taught: hopeful people expect obstacles and prepare detours, while low-hope people abandon goals at the first barrier. His 1994 book The Psychology of Hope: You Can Get There from Here gave the construct its full statement, and his posthumously published work extended it to the very old, the very ill, and to children in classrooms.

Measurement: The Hope Scale

With collaborators he built the Adult Hope Scale and the Children's Hope Scale, brief self-report instruments that separately score agency and pathways thinking. The scales spread rapidly through education, clinical, sport, and health research, and hope became a standard variable in studies of academic achievement, coping with illness, depression, and athletic performance. Snyder's group also developed hope-focused interventions — teaching goal-setting, pathway generation, and self-talk that strengthens agency — applied in schools, clinics, and organizations.

Building Positive Psychology

Snyder was among the small group of researchers who assembled positive psychology into a field. He co-edited the Handbook of Positive Psychology (2002) and the Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology (2009) with Shane Lopez, co-authored Positive Psychology: The Scientific and Practical Explorations of Human Strengths — the field's first textbook — and edited the influential collection Coping: The Psychology of What Works (1999). In his last years he linked hope to forgiveness, arguing that both free people from the past and connect them to future possibilities.

Major Publications

  • Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The Human Pursuit of Difference. New York: Plenum.
  • Snyder, C. R., Higgins, R. L., & Stuckey, R. J. (1983). Excuses: Masquerades in Search of Grace. New York: Wiley.
  • Snyder, C. R., et al. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 570–585.
  • Snyder, C. R. (1994). The Psychology of Hope: You Can Get There from Here. New York: Free Press.
  • Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of Positive Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (Eds.). (2009). Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Impact and Legacy

Hope is now a household variable in motivation and well-being research, taught in measurement courses, used in clinical and educational interventions, and debated in hundreds of studies a year — a direct inheritance from Snyder's insistence that hope could be defined, measured, and strengthened. His mentees carried hope research and positive psychology into departments and schools across the country. When he died of cancer in Lawrence, Kansas, on January 17, 2006, at 61, the University of Kansas established the C. R. Snyder Graduate Award in Positive Psychology in his memory.

The theory has attracted substantive criticism, which Snyder himself partly anticipated:

  • Construct overlap. Hope, optimism, and self-efficacy predict similar outcomes and correlate strongly with one another; critics have questioned whether they are meaningfully distinct constructs or redescriptions of a general positive-outcome expectancy, and discriminant-validity studies have produced mixed answers.
  • The two-factor structure is shaky. The Hope Scale's agency and pathways subscales correlate so highly that many factor analyses support a single underlying factor, complicating the theory's claim that "will" and "ways" are separable psychological ingredients.
  • Correlation ahead of causation. Much of the evidence linking high hope to achievement and health is correlational; longitudinal and experimental tests of hope-raising interventions exist but tend to involve small samples and short follow-ups, leaving the practical payoff less certain than the scale's ubiquity suggests.
  • Hope is not always adaptive. The theory treats higher hope as better, but there are circumstances — terminal illness, unattainable goals, abusive relationships — in which persistent goal-directed striving predicts worse outcomes than disengagement. Research on goal disengagement and on "false hope" suggests the framework's monotonic assumption is too simple.
  • An individualist model of a social phenomenon. Hope theory locates the action entirely inside the individual's cognition. Critics from cultural and community psychology argue that in conditions of poverty, discrimination, or chronic violence, the binding constraint is the availability of routes rather than the person's capacity to imagine them, and that a scale measuring imagination can look like a measure of privilege.
  • The individualizing critique of positive psychology. Like the broader field he helped build, Snyder's framework has been criticized for treating hope as a personal skill to be trained while underweighting the structural conditions that make goal pursuit and pathway generation objectively impossible for some people regardless of their thinking style.

Snyder's response to such critiques was, characteristically, to treat them as homework: in his last interviews he argued that hope research needed bigger trials, better causal designs, and more attention to people for whom hope is hardest to sustain.

Learn More

References

  • Snyder, C. R. (2002). Handbook of Hope. Academic Press.

Last updated: 2026-10-20

Menu
Loading